BAISH Logo
BuenosAiresAISafetyHub
AboutProgramsResearchResourcesContact
EnglishEspañol
Home / Resources

Why we work on this

The case for taking AI seriously

We don't know how AI will turn out, and we don't think anyone does. But you don't need to trust anyone's predictions to see that something unusual is happening. The evidence is already public. Here it is, along with the best places to start if you want to dig deeper.

Where things are headed

The chart below is the single most useful graph we know for understanding AI progress. It comes from METR, an independent research lab that measures what AI agents can actually do, not what companies say they can do.

Every few months, AI completes tasks twice as long

Scale
Measurements above 16 hrs are unreliable30 min2 hrs8 hrs16 hrs20192020202120222023202420252026Model release dateTask length (human time)GPT-2GPT-3GPT-3.5GPT-4o3GPT-5Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.2 (high)Claude Opus 4.6GPT-2GPT-4Claude Opus 4.6Claude Mythos Preview
30 min ≈ fixing a small bug · 16 hrs ≈ two days of expert workSource: METR (independent evaluations)

Each dot is an AI model, placed by the length of task it can complete on its own, measured by how long that same task takes a human expert. In 2019, the best systems managed tasks that take a person a few seconds. Today they handle tasks that take an expert a full day.

The striking part is the rhythm. For six years, that task length has doubled roughly every seven months. Over the past year, roughly every four. Flip the chart to a log scale and the explosion becomes a straight line: that's what steady doubling looks like. COVID taught us how fast exponentials escalate, and it only takes a few more doublings to go from one day to one year.

The money tells the same story. This is already one of the largest private bets on a single technology in history. Either AI progress hits a wall soon, or it becomes the driving force of the global economy. It's getting harder to bet on the wall.

$100M → $45B

Anthropic's annualized revenue, end of 2023 → mid-2026

Roughly 10× growth per year, which makes it one of the fastest-growing companies ever.

$600B+

Big-tech spending on AI infrastructure in 2026 alone

The entire Apollo program cost ~$250B (inflation-adjusted) over 13 years.

7 → 4 months

Time it takes for AI task length to double

Six years of steady doubling, and the pace is picking up.

What people in this field actually worry about

Speed alone isn't the problem. The problem is speed without understanding. Modern AI isn't engineered like a bridge; it's grown, and the people building it are routinely surprised by what it does. These are the specific failure modes researchers spend their time on, each with active work behind it.

AI smarter than us

We don't know what can happen when AI becomes smarter than we are, and neither do the people building it. We can't reliably write down what we want these systems to do, and we can't reliably check what they've learned to want. Today's models already show early warning signs in controlled tests: behaving differently when they think they're being observed, gaming their own reward signals. Keeping a smarter-than-human AI pointed at what we actually meant is an unsolved technical problem. Researchers may solve it in time, but there's no guarantee.

Read morePodcast on this issue

If it goes well

None of this means AI is simply bad. The same capabilities that worry us could compress decades of progress in medicine, science, and poverty reduction into a few years. That's exactly why the stakes run high in both directions. The goal isn't to stop AI. It's to make sure we can steer it.

Self-study

Last updated: October 22, 2025

Curricula and reading lists for going deeper on your own.

Fundamental reading

AI Alignment Forum: Curated Sequences

List of sequences curated by the AI Alignment Forum team, featuring work from Richard Ngo, Paul Christiano, etc.

Category: Technical Alignment
Created by: Various

Standard introductory courses

BlueDot Impact: Alignment & Governance

Covers key concepts and research perspectives in AI safety, split into two main streams: Alignment and Governance. Previously known as AI Safety Fundamentals.

Category: Technical Alignment, Governance
Created by: BlueDot Impact

Related resources

Events & training

Upcoming fellowships, conferences, facilitated courses etc.

AI Digest

Interactive explainers of AI capabilities and trends

Agentic Coding Workshop

BMAD methodology, agents, workflows, and tools for AI-assisted development

A BAISH ProjectAlpha

AI Safety Talent Network

Your career command center for AI safety. Upload your CV to get started instantly, then let our AI agent build a rich profile through conversation.

Smart Notifications

Get notified when new roles, grants, or programs match your profile, so you never miss an opportunity

CV to Profile in Seconds

Upload your CV and get an instant profile. Our AI extracts your skills, experience, and interests automatically

Agentic Profile Enrichment

An AI agent chats with you to uncover goals, preferences, and context that no CV captures, and builds a richer profile over time

Explore ASTN→safetytalent.org
BAISH Logo

Buenos Aires AI Safety Hub

© 2026 BAISH. All rights reserved.

AboutProgramsResearchResourcesContact
Privacy Policy